Both mock and stub are mummy objects for unit test in spring.When you have lots of dependencies in unit test, creating fake object to reduce dependency is really recommended. Therefore, we use mock and stub. But there are some differences between mock and stub.
Stub is a common way to use without extra dependency in unit test.It trys to describe the behevior of the method, So we just concern about the return value when use stub.
Here is example:
Now we have a method in the instance of the CashRegister, It have purchase and printer so that It can print the bill when invoke process.
But it is not realistic for us to use a real printer in our test, so we try to use a fake printer to do unit test.
In stub approach:
We create a sub printer
We test “if printer is invoked when process”
Mock is similar with stub, but mock is a real fake object.
We can test the above method as:
By using the framework of Mockito, we can create a fake object by Class, and the verify assertion can check if the method has been invoked.
According to Martin Fowler’s article:
Dummyobjects are passed around but never actually used. Usually they are just used to fill parameter lists.
Fakeobjects actually have working implementations, but usually take some shortcut which makes them not suitable for production (an in memory database is a good example).
Stubsprovide canned answers to calls made during the test, usually not responding at all to anything outside what’s programmed in for the test. Stubs may also record information about calls, such as an email gateway stub that remembers the messages it ‘sent’, or maybe only how many messages it ‘sent’.
Mocksare what we are talking about here: objects pre-programmed with expectations which form a specification of the calls they are expected to receive.